A New Mexico court has ordered Meta to pay an additional $567 million to address the youth mental health crisis...

I had a startling realization about eight days ago, so found it fascinating that Sean Patrick Tario mentioned the very...

We're living through one of the greatest technological shifts in human history, yet one of the most important questions is rarely asked: Do our constitutional rights still apply in the digital world?

As artificial intelligence, surveillance technologies, and data collection become woven into everyday life, digital sovereignty is no longer just a technology issue—it's a stewardship issue. In this edition, I introduce why the Electronic Bill of Rights (EBOR) has become an important part of the Sacred Stewardship framework and why protecting human dignity, privacy, and freedom in the digital age matters to every one of us.

This also marks the beginning of an exciting collaboration with Rex Lee, technology investigative journalist for The Epoch Times and author of the Electronic Bill of Rights (EBOR). Together, we'll be exploring the intersection of technology, constitutional rights, digital sovereignty, and faithful stewardship - quipping individuals, families, churches, businesses, and leaders to navigate the AI age with wisdom, courage, and moral clarity.

This is the first article in a new LinkedIn newsletter series: Digital Sovereignty: Stewarding Freedom in the AI Age. I hope you'll subscribe and join the conversation as we explore one of the defining stewardship challenges of our generation

This tragedy happened in 2019.

Yet today, Snapchat resurfaced it as fresh engagement content through a Discover publisher called "Killer Bites" - a true crime channel that packages stories about murdered children, serial killers, missing persons, and violent crimes into short-form videos designed to capture attention and keep people watching.

A two-year-old child's death was transformed into a push notification.
Not because I searched for it or someone sent it to me, but because an algorithm decided it was worth interrupting my day.

The child became content.
The tragedy became the hook.
My attention became the product.

The deeper question is this:

Why are technology companies proactively pushing emotionally charged, traumatic, and sensationalized content to users? Why has maximizing engagement become the default business model instead of protecting human well-being, ESPECIALLY when children and teenagers are using these platforms every day?

That should disturb every parent.

⬇️ I researched what "Killer Bites" actually is, why Snapchat pushed a six-year-old tragedy to my phone, and why I believe Snapchat remains a #HardNo for children.

This week, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) once again exposed a hair-raisingly disturbing reality: childlike sex dolls continue...