Cart
0
The historic child-safety settlement matters. It does not erase years of conscious design choices, lobbying, resistance, and harm.
In Sacred Stewardship: Restoring Moral Clarity in the Digital Age, we examine the addictive features deliberately built into social-media platforms: infinite scroll, autoplay, algorithmic recommendations, notifications, likes, filters, streaks, and other mechanisms designed to keep people, including kids, engaged for as long as possible.
These features are not accidental. They are not neutral tools that children and families simply failed to use responsibly. They are design decisions.
For years, parents, survivors, researchers, whistleblowers, attorneys general, and child-safety advocates have warned that platforms like Facebook and Instagram were exploiting children’s vulnerabilities, collecting their data, manipulating their attention, and exposing them to harmful and sexualized content.
Families were told to monitor more closely and children were blamed for lacking self-control.
Parents were made to feel as though they were individually failing to manage products engineered by some of the wealthiest and most technologically sophisticated companies in history. Meanwhile, the platforms kept growing, lobbying, denying, deflecting, and profiting. Now Meta is finally being forced to change.
A Historic Settlement and a Long-Overdue Reckoning
On August 26, a federal court approved a landmark multistate settlement requiring Meta to pay at least $12.19 billion, and potentially as much as $17.1 billion, while changing how Instagram and Facebook serve children and teenagers.
The settlement resolves claims brought by 51 attorneys general alleging that Meta designed Instagram with addictive features, knowingly exposed young people to serious harms, improperly collected children’s data, and misled families and the public about the safety of its platforms.
Meta continues to deny wrongdoing.
But under the court-approved agreement, it must introduce protections families have demanded for years, including:
- Daily time limits for minors.
- Mandatory interruptions to endless scrolling.
- Restrictions on overnight access.
- Suppressed notifications during school hours.
- Stronger age-assurance measures.
- More protective content settings.
- Parental options to disable algorithmic feeds and autoplay.
- Limits on beauty filters, visible “like” counts, and other social-comparison features.
- Independent assessment of implementation and effectiveness.
These changes matter, but forgive me if I'm not jumping up and down.
Safer Design Was Always Possible
The most important lesson is not the size of the settlement.
It's what the required reforms confirm: Meta could have designed safer products all along.
- The company can limit notifications.
- It can interrupt compulsive use.
- It can disable autoplay.
- It can reduce algorithmic manipulation.
- It can strengthen parental controls.
- It can restrict harmful and sexualized content.
- It can verify age more effectively.
The question was never whether Meta had the technical ability to protect children.
The question was whether it was willing to sacrifice engagement, growth, influence, and profit to do so. Again and again, the answer was no - until lawsuits, public outrage, state enforcement, and political pressure made continued resistance more expensive. Children should never have needed a historic lawsuit to receive basic protections.
We Have Been Researching Meta for Years
Sacred Stewardship’s concerns about Meta did not begin with this settlement. I have been researching and writing about this company, its business model, its addictive design, its data practices, its lobbying, its effect on families, and the harms associated with its platforms for years because my own children have been harmed by Instagram, Snap, and TikTok. I have stood outside their HQ with parents whose kids are no longer on earth because of their negligent, toxic platforms.
And the condemning evidence mounts of the mass scale harms continue to mount daily. Every week seems to bring more lawsuits, internal documents, whistleblower disclosures, survivor testimony, enforcement actions, research, or reporting that raises new questions about what Meta knew, when it knew it, and why meaningful changes were delayed.
We have listened to survivor parents describe unimaginable losses. We watched Mark Zuckerberg face grieving families in the United States Senate and apologize after being pressed to do so. Families should not have to beg billionaires to stop designing products that harm, and in some cases, kill their children.
An apology without sustained accountability is not leadership, a settlement reached after years of resistance is not moral courage, and safety measures introduced only when the financial and legal consequences become unavoidable do not erase the choices that came before them.
Meta has spent enormous sums lobbying government while resisting reforms that parents and advocates have pleaded for. So yes, we welcome every safeguard that genuinely protects a child, AND, we remain deeply unimpressed with Meta’s "leadership". We will judge this company by its actions - not its advertising, public-relations campaigns, apologies, promises, or settlement headlines.
Life Was Better Before Social Media
This is not merely a policy position for me. It's incredibly personal. In my own experience and humble opinion, life was infinitely happier, more peaceful, more private, and less divided before platforms like Facebook and Instagram became woven into nearly every part of human life.
We kept in touch with friends by calling them, we visited people, we gathered around tables, we spent time with our children without turning every moment into content, we experienced life without constantly comparing it to someone else’s edited version.
We disagreed without algorithms amplifying our anger or going "no contact" and we knew our neighbors as people, not profiles.
We didn't publish photographs of our children, families, homes, schools, vacations, relationships, and routines for strangers, data brokers, advertisers, predators, artificial-intelligence systems, and technology companies to study, store, analyze, and monetize.
We lived our lives.
Try Leaving for Two Weeks
I encourage you to conduct your own experiment. Delete Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok from your phone for two weeks. Do not merely move the apps into another folder. Remove them.
Then pay attention.
- How do you feel?
- Are you calmer?
- Are you more present?
- Are you sleeping better?
- Are you comparing yourself less?
- Are you reaching for your phone less often?
Are you spending more time talking with your children, calling friends, praying, reading, walking, creating, resting, or participating in your community?
Do you feel as though you lost something essential, or recovered something valuable?
You do not need a social-media platform to maintain real friendships.
Pick Up the Phone.
Invite People Over.
Play Cards.
Play Board Games.
Write a Letter.
Write a Thank You Note.
Gather Around a Table.
Return to Real Life.
#SkipSocial
Sacred Stewardship will continue encouraging families to embrace Delay Is the Way when it comes to smartphones and social media apps.
Childhood should not be surrendered to devices, algorithms, advertisers, or strangers. Parents now have a growing list of reasons not to post photographs of their children, families, homes, schools, and daily routines online.
Children cannot meaningfully consent to having their childhood documented and permanently distributed. Their images can be collected, copied, manipulated, scraped into databases, used to train artificial-intelligence systems, or exploited in ways parents never anticipated.
- Privacy is protection.
- Presence is protection.
- Delay is protection.
- And sometimes the wisest digital decision is simply to walk away.
Introducing the #ByeByeBigTech Campaign
Sacred Stewardship is preparing a new public-service campaign:
#ByeByeMeta
#ByeByeSnap
#ByeByeTikTok
#ByeByeBigTech
This is an invitation to turn away from platforms that do not merely fail to prevent harm, but repeatedly resist accountability while continuing practices they have been warned can harm children, families, privacy, mental health, and social cohesion.
It is a call to stop rewarding poor leadership with our attention, data, photographs, relationships, and money.
It is a call to redirect our time toward our families, churches, neighborhoods, communities, and real human relationships.
- It is not anti-technology.
- It is pro-child.
- Pro-family.
- Pro-privacy.
- Pro-human dignity.
- Pro-real life.
Technology should serve humanity. Humanity should not be harvested to serve technology companies.
Connecticut Has a Sacred Opportunity
This moment is also deeply local for Sacred Stewardship.
Connecticut is expected to receive as much as $265.4 million from the Meta settlement. At least half must be directed toward addressing harms associated with youth social-media use, including mental-health and crisis services, after-school programming, and phone-free school initiatives.
This money should not be used only to treat children after they have been harmed.
A meaningful portion must be invested in prevention:
- Parent education and digital literacy.
- Child-exploitation and sextortion prevention.
- Phone-free schools and childhood-restoration initiatives.
- Survivor-informed programs.
- Community and faith-based education.
- Counseling and healing resources.
- Training that equips parents, churches, educators, and trusted adults to recognize risks before a crisis occurs.
We believe prevention begins before a child is harmed and that educated, equipped parents are one of the strongest layers of protection around children. Sacred Stewardship intends to advocate for transparency, public participation, and prevention-focused investment as Connecticut determines how these funds will be used.
The Problem Is Bigger Than One Company
Meta deserves scrutiny, but Meta is also a symptom of a deeper disorder - looking outside of ourselves and our Creator for acceptance, significance, and security. Snapchat and TikTok are equally destructive. The harms of these awful platforms overwhelmingly outweigh any benefits, they put our kids physical, mental and emotional health in danger, and they put our country at risk.
They are addictive by design, expose children to sexualized and dangerous content, undermine privacy, distort identity, encourage comparison and cruelty, and replace real relationships with counterfeit connection.
We do not believe children belong on them, and, frankly, we question whether most adults are better off there either.
- Our society has treated attention as a commodity.
- We have treated privacy as something to surrender.
- We have treated children as users, consumers, data points, and sources of revenue.
- We have separated freedom from responsibility and innovation from moral obligation.
- Technology did not create all of our cultural brokenness. It scaled it, monetized it, personalized it, and placed it directly into children’s hands.
- Policy can restrain corporate misconduct.
- Courts can impose consequences.
- Law enforcement can hold offenders accountable.
- Technology can be redesigned.
And, families, churches, schools, and communities must also reclaim their responsibility to form and protect children. We must teach children that their identity does not come from an algorithm, filter, follower count, or stranger’s approval. We must restore parents as the primary protectors and disciplers of their children and we must help churches move beyond awareness and become educated, equipped, and mobilized.
Most importantly, we must recover the truth that human dignity is sacred, children are sacred, and protecting them, all of them - not just our own - is our shared sacred responsibility.
This Is Progress. It Is Not the End.
The Meta settlement is significant, however, it cannot become a substitute for KOSA, meaningful Section 230 reform, children’s privacy protections, exploitation prevention, independent oversight, and permanent platform accountability. Nor should it persuade families that Facebook and Instagram are suddenly safe, healthy, or necessary.
Meta now has an opportunity to demonstrate real change. We hope it does. But trust is not restored through a press release. It's rebuilt through repentance, transparency, accountability, changed behavior, and years of faithful action.
Until then, we will continue researching, writing, and publishing the evidence.
We will continue standing with survivor parents.
We will continue calling out conscious harm and failed leadership.
And we will continue encouraging families to take back their attention, privacy, relationships, children, and homes.
Maybe the answer is not learning to use these platforms more safely.
Maybe the answer is remembering that we lived without them before and we can live without them again.
Let’s go back to true living.
#ByeByeMeta
#ByeByeSnap
#ByeByeTikTok
#ByeByeBigTech
#SkipSocial
“Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.”
~ Romans 12:2
A Sacred Stewardship Prayer
Lord, thank You for every parent, survivor, advocate, whistleblower, attorney, policymaker, and protector who refused to remain silent.
Let this settlement produce real change, not performative promises.
Change the hearts and minds of the leaders of Meta, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, Roblox, and every company shaping the lives of young people. Move them beyond legal compliance toward truth, responsibility, repentance, and genuine action.
Give parents wisdom and courage to establish boundaries, protect their children’s privacy, and choose real relationships over digital counterfeits.
Help us recover our attention, our peace, our families, and our communities.
Awaken the Church to its sacred responsibility. Protect children who remain vulnerable, bind up the brokenhearted, and bring healing to families carrying wounds no financial settlement can repair.
Children are sacred. Give us the strength to protect them - all of them.
Amen.
Sources: Connecticut Attorney General William Tong’s settlement announcement · Court-approved settlement terms · Reuters reporting and court-approval update
